Another school shooting.
Perhaps it is time for Americans to stop worrying about licensing, gun control, concealed carry, imaginary "gun-free zones", and arm ourselves wherever we go, at all times, without regard to its acceptability to the grass-eaters.
It is clear that the only protection we can count on comes from ourselves.
Our new motto: "I exercise my constitutional rights because you will not!"
Saturday, February 9, 2008
Monday, February 4, 2008
Watch out for Words This Election
Propaganda is the single greatest controlling force in the
world; as a tool for persuasion, it is far more powerful than any
weapon of violence could ever be.
“The broad masses of a population are more amenable to the
appeal of rhetoric than to any other force.” [Adolf Hitler]
“Print is the sharpest and the strongest weapon of our party.”
[Joseph Stalin]
world; as a tool for persuasion, it is far more powerful than any
weapon of violence could ever be.
“The broad masses of a population are more amenable to the
appeal of rhetoric than to any other force.” [Adolf Hitler]
“Print is the sharpest and the strongest weapon of our party.”
[Joseph Stalin]
Conservatism in America
It appears that all three remaining Republican candidates are trying to out-average each other. Where are the heirs to Reagan?
Have Republicans abandoned their principles and become "Democrat - Lites"?
Have Republicans abandoned their principles and become "Democrat - Lites"?
Sunday, February 3, 2008
Common Sense
In January, the Brady Campaign released its annual "State Report Cards," scoring the states according to their gun laws.
Once again, the Brady rankings clearly demonstrate that states that have the most gun control tend to have the most violent crime.
Once again, the Brady rankings clearly demonstrate that states that have the most gun control tend to have the most violent crime.
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
Undocumented Workers
Calling an illegal immigrant an "undocumented worker" is the same as calling a drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist".
Oh, The Irony
Illegal Aliens Rear End Homeland Security VehicleJanuary 29th, 2008 @ 12:49pm
by Jayme West/KTAR
A mini-van full of illegal immigrants rear-ended a Homeland Security SUV Tuesday morning on I-10.
The Arizona Department of Public Safety said the overloaded van was heading west when it was involved in a three-vehicle chain-reaction crash near the Elliot Road off-ramp.
No one was hurt.
The 11 illegal immigrants inside the van were taken into custody by ICE.
by Jayme West/KTAR
A mini-van full of illegal immigrants rear-ended a Homeland Security SUV Tuesday morning on I-10.
The Arizona Department of Public Safety said the overloaded van was heading west when it was involved in a three-vehicle chain-reaction crash near the Elliot Road off-ramp.
No one was hurt.
The 11 illegal immigrants inside the van were taken into custody by ICE.
Wednesday, December 5, 2007
Can you Spin a Debate?
The CNN/YouTube Republican Debate has damaged the reputation of CNN for its "failure" to properly vet the questioners before airing their questions. Even a simple Google search, it is claimed, would have revealed the partisan alignments of the questioners (as though their leading, self-serving questions didn't do that).
Yet the questions were selected from YouTube submissions. The process was done on line. And not a one of the questioners was a member of the "general public". All had some quirky political connection.
The questions appeared to have been chosen to subtly cast the Republican candidates in a poor light, if possible. And make no doubt about it, the General was known to the CNN staffers. No one brings a person like that to a debate, flies him out and puts him up at network expense, seats him conveniently, and then allows an off-topic non-issue question (designed to make the candidates appear intolerant) to be asked without knowing who he is.
This was a subtle attempt to spin an entire debate that backfired.
CNN vetted the carefully selected questioners - they just hoped no one else would.
Yet the questions were selected from YouTube submissions. The process was done on line. And not a one of the questioners was a member of the "general public". All had some quirky political connection.
The questions appeared to have been chosen to subtly cast the Republican candidates in a poor light, if possible. And make no doubt about it, the General was known to the CNN staffers. No one brings a person like that to a debate, flies him out and puts him up at network expense, seats him conveniently, and then allows an off-topic non-issue question (designed to make the candidates appear intolerant) to be asked without knowing who he is.
This was a subtle attempt to spin an entire debate that backfired.
CNN vetted the carefully selected questioners - they just hoped no one else would.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
